The state of California is still debating whether or not to legalize sports betting in the state of the Golden State. There are various initiatives underway right now that aim to legalize some type of sports betting in some form. Each organization is working hard to ensure that its proposition appears on the November ballot.

Two notable measures have received a significant amount of support

Known as the Tribal Sports Wagering Act, it is yet another push on the part of California’s tribes to legalize sports wagering throughout the state. The legislation proposes the introduction of sports betting at tribal casinos and thoroughbred racetracks throughout the Golden State. Those who support the passage of this legislation have been advocating for its implementation since 2020, but their efforts have been hampered by the pandemic. In contrast, Californians for Solutions to Homelessness and Mental Health Support is a proposal that envisions the legalization of internet sports betting for all major betting operators, including tribal betting operations. A number of the most prominent brands in American gaming, including BetMGM, DraftKings, and FanDuel, have come out in support of the measure. It has stated that it will contribute a portion of the revenues to those in need.

As a result, both measures anticipate a high level of interest in sports betting in California, and each group is striving to be the first to profit from the opportunities that lie ahead. Analysts estimate that the amount of money wagered on sports in California will surpass the amount wagered in New York.

Top 3 Online Bookmakers in California, CA, USA

• Slot Title
• Pay Back
• Key Features

1

$20 free bet

• Min. Deposit: $10
• Payout speed: 48 hours

$20 free betPlay NowOur score:

$20 free bet

Read more

2

50% first deposit bonus up to $250

• Min. Deposit: $10
• Payout speed: 15 minutes

50% first deposit bonus up to $250Play NowOur score:

50% first deposit bonus up to $250

Read more

3

50% first deposit up to $1,000

• Min. Deposit: $20
• Payout speed: 48 hours

50% first deposit up to $1,000Play NowOur score:

50% first deposit up to $1,000

Read more

A conflict of interest continues to rage

It appears that there is a disagreement, since some people support the first measure while others support the second measure. Despite the fact that the tribal legislation has received widespread support from California’s tribes, the state’s cardrooms have slammed it. According to cardroom proprietors, changes in tribal gambling rules could force them out of business and create an anti-competitive market for their products. Those who own cardrooms are concerned that the measure will allow tribal governments to sue cardrooms even when the latter have not violated any laws.

Taxpayers Against Special Interest Monopolies, a group formed to combat the tribal bill, has joined forces with opponents of the measure. The commercial measure, on the other hand, was opposed by tribal organizations in California and has been gaining traction ever since it was introduced. According to the results of the poll, eight percent fewer people are positive to it now than they were in November. Paul Boden, executive director of the Western Region Advocacy Project and one of the most vocal opponents of the commercial measure, is among those who have spoken out against it. He went into greater detail about why he believes this is the case. As they have clearly learned with the State Lottery and their public schools, it is simply bad public policy to attempt to fund homelessness and mental health programs with promises of a small share of the profits of online gambling corporations. Boden affirmed that the impoverished are indeed in desperate need of assistance, but he went on to say that he has doubts about the sincerity with which commercial operators make their claims. The outcome of the two initiatives is still up in the air.