Locals stopped the controversial Proposition 26 from passing, allowing California card rooms to rest comfortably. Many believed the bill would have granted too much authority to tribal casinos.

Allegedly, the proposal would have endangered entire communities.

Cardrooms and their partners are pleased with the outcome of the campaign.

Top 3 Online poker Sites in California, CA, USA

• Slot Title
• Pay Back
• Key Features

1

Poker bonus: 100% first deposit bonus up to $500

• Fast-Fold Zone Poker Options
• Payout Speed: Instant

Poker bonus: 100% first deposit bonus up to $500Play NowOur score:

Poker bonus: 100% first deposit bonus up to $500

Read more

2

Poker bonus: $2,000 in deposit bonuses

• Superb player traffic
• Payout Speed: Instant

Poker bonus: $2,000 in deposit bonusesPlay NowOur score:

Poker bonus: $2,000 in deposit bonuses

Read more

3

Poker bonus: 100% first deposit bonus up to $3,000

• Anonymous Tables
• Payout Speed: <24 hours

Poker bonus: 100% first deposit bonus up to $3,000Play NowOur score:

Poker bonus: 100% first deposit bonus up to $3,000

Read more

Prop 26 May Have Hurt the Economy

The purpose of Proposition 26 was to change local laws, allow tribal operators to hire private trial lawyers, and eliminate the job of attorney general. 

It is not unexpected that the proposal soon sparked controversy, as many thought that tribe operators would have been able to exploit this authority to eliminate their rivals.

According to estimates, Proposition 26 posed a threat to the livelihoods of over 32,000 individuals and a total of $1.6 billion in pay. According to experts, the policy might have had an economic impact of approximately $5.5 billion.

The motion was unanimously opposed by commercial operators. Numerous groups, including the California Contract Cities Association, the Gateway Cities Council of Governments, AFSCME California, the Disabled American Veterans, the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, and the Los Angeles County Business Federation, united in opposition to the tribal measure. 

The results are in after several months of hard campaigning on both sides. It turns out that Californians did not support Proposition 26.

The Opposition Wins 

Press representatives of the tribal measure’s opponents stated that it failed to deceive California voters. They proceeded to refer to the initiative as a “major expansion of gambling by five affluent tribes” and stated that the measure “contained a poison pill” that would have stolen a significant portion of the market from highly regulated cardrooms.

Many communities would have been harmed, and tens of thousands of jobs would have been jeopardized, according to the opponents. They are pleased that proposition 26 was strongly rejected by the people, as they saw how detrimental it would have been for California.

Juan Garza, the executive director of California Towns for Self-Reliance Joint Powers Authority and a representative of the five cities in which cardrooms support essential services, is pleased that Californians rejected Proposition 26. Garza praised all state voters for rejecting a plan that, in his opinion, would have impacted thousands of individuals.

Special Offer for California: Join Bovada now for you to claim 100% poker welcome bonus of up to $500.