The Indiana Gaming Commission has issued a positive report on iGaming Lou De Aguila 10. October 2022 | UPDATED ON: 10. October 2022 Post Views: 130 Three years after Indiana‘s launch of sports betting in September 2019, discussions of iGaming are certain to generate heated debate. The Indiana Games Commission has compiled a report on the implementation of online casino gaming in the state. The good news is that the analysis indicates that implementing iGaming in the Hoosier State should be very uncomplicated regardless of the model selected. Top 3 Sports Betting Sites For Players From Indiana in 2022 Slot Title Pay Back Key Features 1 225% First Deposit Bonus Payout rate: 98.56%Payout Speed: 1-5 days225% First Deposit BonusPlay NowOur score: 225% First Deposit BonusRead more2 200% Welcome Bonus of Up to $2,000 Payout rate: 91%Payout Speed: 1-2 days200% Welcome Bonus of Up to $2,000Play NowOur score: 200% Welcome Bonus of Up to $2,000Read more3 Welcome Bonus Up to $5,000 Payout rate: 97.92%Payout Speed: 1-2 daysWelcome Bonus Up to $5,000Play NowOur score: Welcome Bonus Up to $5,000Read more Introducing online gambling to Indiana Spectrum Gaming Group conducted a 103-page report commissioned by the Indiana Gaming Commission (IGC). The purpose of the study was to assess the viability of online casino gambling, or iGaming, in Indiana. The paper has a release date of July 25, 2022, and is now marked as a “hot subject” on the IGC website. According to the report, adding iGaming to the Indiana market should be a “pretty straightforward procedure,” and sports betting, which Hoosiers are already familiar with, should “enable a speedy adoption.” This might be excellent news for the State’s coffers, given that iGaming has gained momentum during the global pandemic and the infrastructure required to support this expansion appears to be merely a stepping stone, not the industry’s final destination. The paper focuses on various crucial aspects and phases of iGaming implementation in Indiana, including taxation, licensing participation and revenue forecasts, and risk assessment and management. Notably, it examines and compares how other governments have established their iGaming legislation and taxation. David Rebuck, the veteran director of the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement, was quoted in the memo as stating that iGaming tax rates will be “greater than the retail casino rate,” but that taxes should not be excessively high. The authors of the paper suggest that if the tax rate is too high, operators will seek to relocate enterprises or customers “to a state with a lower tax rate.” Apparently, this form of tax leakage is typical in internet companies, and iGaming is no different. Revenue and Tax Receipt Forecasts Examining the relationship between iGaming revenue numbers and tax rates, the paper concludes that the tax rate is not “necessarily determinative of an operator’s performance”; but, it does determine how lucrative the business can be for the state. Other criteria, such as the distribution of casinos, levels of competition, and marketing, were also cited as influential, highlighting the complexity of the process of calculating tax rates. In addition to enhancing the state’s overall tax revenue, adopting iGaming may have a negative influence on the business of traditional brick-and-mortar casinos. This will depend greatly on the model of iGaming that the state decides to implement, with the open model permitting all gaming operators to apply for a license, the closed model restricting licensing to only state casinos for online gaming, and the recently popularized hybrid model requiring outside operators to obtain a licensing agreement with Indiana casinos. Indiana’s establishment of sports betting followed a hybrid strategy. The research argues that considering the six iGaming states, as they are described to in the paper, “Spectrum does not anticipate iGaming to have a detrimental impact on Indiana casino revenues” and provides numerous forecasts for potential iGaming income and tax receipts. Spectrum evaluated potential revenue amounts using three methodologies and examined three tax rate scenarios, calculating tax rates of 20%, 30%, and 45%. The findings are broken down by year for the first three years, with a 3-year average of $1.96 billion in iGaming income based on the three approaches. This would result in tax revenues of $392,4 million, $588,6 million, or $882,9 million depending on whether the tax rate was 20%, 30%, or 45%. For context, sports betting was legalized in Indiana in September 2019, which is a month over three years ago. Since then, the business has generated over $60 million in tax income. Our Recommended US Sports Betting Site in 2021 Our Rating Score a $250 Welcome Sports Bonus The Best Lines, Props And Live Betting Accepts Wide Range Of Payment Methods Including Bitcoin Bet On Traditional Sports + Politics, Esports & Virtual Sports Claim Your Bonus Now About Lou De Aguila Lou Aguila is a news and feature writer for Golden Casino News. For over a decade, Lou has published news and featured articles for some of the most reputable sports betting and online casino sites in the world, including BetNow.UK, VegasOdds, and BWin. Apart from being a hardcore live casino punter, he also covers sports stories in North American leagues from time to time. View all posts by Lou De Aguila →
